8/30/2023 0 Comments Brilliance definition physics![]() It (classic mechanics) has failed in connection with conceiving of a relativity theory as it was represented to everybody in that time. How it can chow oneself, these illogicalities are connected with Nils Bohr's bad knowledge of a classic mechanics. only with additional disturbance, not with full energy of an electron.ĥ) Steady orbits are considered equivalent, while the electron always, eventually, returns to steady basic orbit. Why it was not a success?įive illogicalities are evident at the first acquaintance to the theory of Bohr:ġ) Deviation from classic principles in definition of a total energy of an electron on orbit.Ģ) Error judgement that the electron at motion on orbit in accordance with the laws of a classic electrodynamics should emit energy.ģ) Allocation of steady stationary orbits of an electron not as a problem of a mechanics, but as a problem of no emitted electron.Ĥ) The frequency of radiation correlate with Δ E (not with E + Δ E), i.e. The approach of Bohr has appeared most successful, as he used the mechanism theory of a classic mechanics based on outcomes of experiments of the Rutherford, and it was the most exact path. ![]() The second part – creation of the theory – has appeared simply impracticable, as the empirical laws are not related to a physical reality and their causal essence is not detected. Thus, in development of a quantum mechanics the first part is made only: creation of the empirical laws. All hopes in creation any acceptable theory was connected with a mathematical formalism, the program of which most brightly was expressed by Feynman : ".Probably, the best way of creation of the new theory is to guess equations, not paying attention to physical analogs or physical explanation". Having refused from the mechanical program, the developers of a quantum mechanics have appeared in a very unpleasant situation, when, using the language, methods and analogies of a classic mechanics, they persistently convinced themselves and other in impossibility of fulfillment of its requirements. ![]() It should look so: "The problem of physical sciences is, that all physical phenomena to reduce to attraction forces, repulsion and to radiation, the value which one should depend on distance between interacting bodies, from their charge, mass, velocity and acceleration". But, taking into account fallacy of the Helmholtz concerning the theory of a delayed potential of Gauss, Weber, Gerber etc, it is possible now to see, that the mechanical program of the Helmholtz requires of principle additions. This program was stated by Newton, Huygens, Euler, Laplace. ![]() "The problem of physical sciences is to reduce all physical phenomena to forces of attraction and repulsion, the value which one should depend on distance between interacting points". That was accompanied by a rebuff from ideals of a classic mechanics, from its invariants, from ether, from the mechanical program, which one most precisely was expressed by the Helmholtz. It formed at once after a special relativity theory and simultaneously with a general theory of relativity. Hardly we can assume other way of development of science, as: observation, fact, experiment, empirical law, check and refinement of the law, creation of the theory, check and refinement of the theory. The quantum mechanics was formed as empirical science – on the basis of observations, facts, experiments. On the basis of research of radiation spectrums and absorption of photons there was a powerful math-physical formalism abounding with principles, guesses, postulates, interpretations, models and mysterious formulas, which one, strangely enough, work.Īll development of quantum mechanics and its broadest application in practice displays, that the researchers have found out the very relevant correlations of a material world, and also have learned to use them. ![]() The exciting pleasure of victories in discovery and becoming of a quantum mechanics has passed. "Brilliance and poverty" of quantum mechanics ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |